manuel fernando ramirez
ColombiaMember since April 21, 2020
Translation:
I am passionate about playing and it entertains me. I would like to advance and be considered a teacher.
My favorite opening is Ruy Lopez. Capablanca, I like how he played.
"Darwin was the first to use data from nature to convince people that evolution is true, and his idea of natural selection was truly novel. It testifies to his genius that the concept of natural theology, accepted by most educated Westerners before 1859, was vanquished within only a few years by a single five-hundred-page book. On the Origin of Species turned the mysteries of life's diversity from mythology into genuine science." -- Jerry Coyne
manuel fernando ramirez
me apasiona jugar y me entretiene me gustaria avanzar y que me consideraran maestro mi apertura favorita es ruy lopez y capablanca me gusta como jugaba
ColombiaMember since April 21, 2020
Translation:
I am passionate about playing and it entertains me. I would like to advance and be considered a teacher.
My favorite opening is Ruy Lopez. Capablanca, I like how he played.
Steve Gildemeister
We don't lose! We learn from it!
GermanyEngineer. Musician and love movies and traveling. I love harassing opponents with Queen and Bishop combinations.
KenyaMember since Mar 4, 2019
Game completion rate: 100%
Leopold
The move is there, but you must see it
ID creationism is misrepresented by its adherents, not its critics.
The various statements of what ID creationism is are simply obfuscations of the following argument:
I don't understand the reason for X phenomenon. Therefore X phenomenon originated by magic.
For example, take the contention that the bacterial flagellum could not have originated through a step by step process. That's an obfuscation of the true argument, which is "I don't understand how the bacterial flagellum could have originated through a step by step process."
The response, of course, is: Well, maybe you not understanding something doesn't mean it can't be understood. There are other reasons why you might not understand something. Maybe you're just stupid.
Dembski gave some talk in Oklahoma, and he got totally pwned. He talked about the bacterial flagellum, and some guy in the audience, during the question and answer session, said, I can explain how the bacterial flagellum could have originated through a step by step process, and did it. Of course, then Dembski wanted more steps. No matter how many steps you present, the ID creationist wants more. This is a slight variation of the ID creationist argument, and reads as follows:
I won't admit that X phenomenon could have originated through natural means. Therefore, X phenomenon must have originated by magic.
And the answer, of course, is: Well, maybe you're just a liar.
The idea that proponents of ID creationism have been discriminated against is based on a misconception - namely, that every idea is of equal merit. ID creationists aren't able to gain acceptance for their ideas not because of philosophical resistance, discrimination, or conspiracy, but because their ideas are stupid. I mean, when a real scientist explains phenomena that an ID creationist says is unexplainable, is the ID creationist still entitled to a respectful hearing for his claim?
ID creationism adherents believe in ID creationism because they haven't considered, or don't want to consider, the possibility that they're just retarded. Well, it's time for them to consider it.
-- Mike Toreno